Leipzig. The way we use land is changing. Demand for farmland, food and energy seems insatiable, but land is a finite resource. The research programme “Sustainable Land Management” investigated the consequences of this land use under global change and developed strategies for a sustainable use within a 7-year research program ending in 2016. Coordinated by the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) a project for coordination, communication, outreach and scientific synthesis was summarizing and integrating results from 12 individual place-based projects across the world. Over 350 international researchers and practitioners are expected at the closing conference running between 7 and 9 March in Berlin.
“We actually can achieve a balance between sustainable land use and food security for humankind,” says Prof. Dr. Ralf Seppelt. He lead the scientific coordination and synthesis project GLUES (Global Assessment of Land Use Dynamics, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Ecosystem Services) . “This can be achieved by farmers intensifying production on environmentally sound land, foodstuffs being better distributed around the globe and people changing their eating habits and throwing less away,” summarizes Seppelt, who is head of Computational Landscape Ecology department at UFZ.
The results of the GLUES project show how important it is that we change our ways or resource use. Amoungst other results GLUES researchers have shown that, contrary to the opinion of many experts, we do not need to increase the amount of land used for agriculture in order to feed the world population until the year 2050. They calculted that global yield could be increased by almost 40 percent, for example from multiple harvests (1). On the contrary they could also demonstrated that there are limits to the use of renewable resources. The analysis showed that production rates of quite a few key resources, such as maize, rice, wheat, fish, meat and milk, have already exceeded their peak rate of production (2).
The global outlook for land use is only one out of many elements of the funding programme “Sustainable Land Management”, which the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funded to the tune of EUR 75 million between 2010 and 2015. 500 scientists around the globe were involved in twelve research projects in different regions. For example, a team of scientists working in the KULUNDA project produced ecological and economical strategies for sustainable land use in the grasslands of the Siberian steppe region (3). Researchers in the Philippines and Vietnam involved in the LEGATO project analysed the conditions under which ecological rice cultivation can be economically profitable (4). The COMTESS project saw scientists develop measures for countering the rise in sea levels in the North Sea and Baltic Sea through sustainable land management along the coast (5).
To allow the individual results relating to the consequences of land use to be consolidated and better assessed and compared, the GLUES researchers defined global land use patterns from more than 30 indicators of agriculture, environment, climate and socio-economics. These archetypes include meadow management systems, degraded forests and agrosystems in the tropics. A global land use map clearly showed, for example, that extensive areas of cultivation in China, India and parts of Russia make up around eleven percent of land area. But the map also highlighted that yields cannot really be increased any more in large parts of western Europe and the USA (6).
The results of the GLUES project will not be confined to the scientific community but are to be put into practice. For example, the secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) has picked up on the topic of sustainable land use. A manual will be produced shortly, providing farmers and development organisations with practical guidance for sustainably managing agricultural land in the form of an advice checklist.
And the LandYOUs computer game has been developed to introduce children and young people to the topic. Players can decide how much of the state budget they want to invest in conservation, reforestation, agriculture and urban development. This teaches them the possible consequences of changes in land use for society, biodiversity, forestry and land management.
(1) Mauser, W., G. Klepper, F. Zabel, R. Delzeit, T. Hank, B. Putzenlechner, A. Calzadilla. 2015. Global Biomass Production Potentials Exceed Expected Future Demand without the Need for Cropland Expansion. Nature Communications, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9946
(2) Seppelt, R., A. M. Manceur, J. Liu, E. P. Fenichel, and S. Klotz. 2014. Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecology and Society, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07039-190450
(3) Novel Methods for Monitoring and Managing Land and Water Resources in Siberia. Herausgeber: Mueller, Lothar, Sheudshen, Askhad K., Eulenstein, Frank (Eds.), Springer Water 2016, ISBN 978-3-319-24409-9, http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319244075#aboutBook
(4) Settele J, Spangenberg JH, Heong KL, Burkhard B, Bustamante JV, Cabbigat J, Chien HV, Escalada M, Grescho V, Hai LH, Harpke A, Horgan F, Hotes S, Jahn R, Kühn I, Marquez L, Schädler M, Tekken V, Vetterlein D, Villareal S, Westphal C, Wiemers M (2015). Agricultural Landscapes and Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia – the LEGATO-Project. Basic and Applied Ecology 16, 661-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.10.003
(5) Karrasch, L., Klenke, T., Woltjer, J. (2014): Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management – A planning approach. Land Use Policy 38, 522-532. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837713002718
(6) Václavík,T., Lautenbach, S., Kuemmerle, T., Seppelt, R. 2013: Mapping global land system archetypes. Global Environ. Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.004.
Prof. Dr. Ralf Seppelt
Head of UFZ-Department of Computational Landscape Ecology